March 11, 2014
Earthquake Research Committee,
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion

Evaluation of Seismic Activities for February 2014

1 Major Seismic Activities

There was no remarkable activity.

2 Nationwide Seismic Activities by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

There was no remarkable activity.

(2) Tohoku Region

* On February 6, there was a magnitude (M) 5.3 earthquake at a depth of approximately 40 km, offshore Miyagi prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in an NW-SE direction. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.

* On February 8, at 02:18 (JST), there was a M5.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 50 km, offshore Fukushima prefecture. On the same day at 11:34, there was also a M4.8 earthquake. The focal mechanism of these events showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. These events occurred on the boundary between the Pacific and the continental plates

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

* On February 11, there was a M5.3 earthquake at a depth of approximately 90 km, offshore south of the Boso peninsula. The focal mechanism had a compression axis in an NW-SE direction. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.

* In the GNSS data for the Tokai region, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake.

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

There was no remarkable activity.

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

* On February 2, there was a M4.5 earthquake at a depth of approximately 45 km under the ocean near Amami Oshima. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in an NNW-SSE direction. This event occurred on the boundary between the Philippine Sea and the continental plates.

* On February 6, there was a M5.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 50 km under the ocean near Miyakojima. The focal mechanism had a compression axis in an E-W direction.

Supplement

* On March 3, there was a M6.4 earthquake at a depth of approximately 120 km, offshore north-west of Okinawa Main Island. The focal mechanism had a compression axis in a direction of the subducting Philippine Sea plate. This event occurred within the Philippine Sea plate.

* On March 3, there was a M5.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 45 km under the ocean near Okinawa Main Island. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction.

Note: [ ] was the regional name of the epicenter used in the Japan Meteorological Agency announcement.
     GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) is a general name of satellite positioning system such as GPS.



Supplementary Information to the Evaluation of Seismic Activities for February 2014

March 11, 2014
Earthquake Research Committee

1 Major Seismic Activities

The following are the numbers of earthquakes by magnitude that occurred in Japan and the surrounding area during February 2014.

(reference)

The following events for the period from Feburuary 2013 to late January 2014 have been listed as "Major Seismic Activities" in monthly "Evaluation of Seismic Activities".

  – Southern Tokachi Region  M6.5 on February 2, 2013
(Depth of approximately 100 km)
  – Northern Tochigi Prefecture  M6.3 on February 25, 2013
(Depth of approximately 5 km)
  – Near Awajishima  M6.3 on April 13, 2013
(Depth of approximately 15 km)
  – Under the Ocean Near Miyakejima  M6.2 on April 17, 2013
(Depth of approximately 10 km)
  – Offshore Miyagi Prefecture  M5.9 on April 17, 2013
(Depth of approximately 60 km)
  – Offshore Fukushima Prefecture  M6.0 on May 18, 2013
(Depth of approximately 45 km)
  – Offshore Miyagi Prefecture  M6.0 on August 4, 2013
(Depth of approximately 60 km)
  – Hamadori, Fukushima Prefecture  M5.9 on September 20, 2013
(Depth of approximately 15 km)
  – Offshore Fukushima Prefecture  M7.1 on October 26, 2013
  – Southern Ibaraki Prefecture  M5.5 on November 10, 2013
(Depth of approximately 65 km)
  – Northern Ibaraki Prefecture  M5.4 on December 31, 2013
(Depth of approximately 5 km)

2 Nationwide Seismic Activities by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

There is no supplementary information for the Hokkaido region.

(2) Tohoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Tohoku region.

(3) Seismic activities and crustal deformations associated with the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

(Reference: Evaluation of Seismic Activities after the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake)

(4) Kanto-Chubu Region

"In the GNSS data for the Tokai region, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake":
(This evaluation is in agreement with the views presented at the regular meeting on February 24 of the Assessment Committee for Areas under Intensified Measures against Earthquake Disaster (reference below).)

(Reference)

Recent seismic and crustal activity in the Tokai region and its vicinity (Seismological and Volcanological Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, February 24, 2014)
"No changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake have been observed until now. (Excerpted)"

(5) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

There is no supplementary information for Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku region.

(6) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

There is no supplementary information for Kyushu-Okinawa region.

Reference 1
Earthquakes that are described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" (Monthly Report of Seismic Activity in Japan) have the following features.

  1. Events of M6.0 and greater, or events that have maximum seismic intensity 4 or greater
  2. Onshore events of M4.5 and greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater
  3. Events under the ocean areas of M5.0 or greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater

Reference 2
Information that is described in the "Supplementary Information to the Evaluation" includes:

  1. Reference information related to seismic activity described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  2. Recent earthquake activity over the past year related to the events described in "Major Seismic Activity" in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  3. Seismic activity that has been evaluated, but not included in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" because it is within normal bounds and not prominent