February 8, 2013
Earthquake Research Committee,
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion

Evaluation of Seismic Activities for January 2013

1 Major Seismic Activities

* On January 28, there was a M4.8 earthquake in northern Ibaraki prefecture. This event had a maximum seismic intensity 5 Lower in Ibaraki prefecture.

* On January 31, there was a M4.7 earthquake in northern Ibaraki prefecture. This event had a maximum seismic intensity 5 Lower in Ibaraki prefecture.

2 Nationwide Seismic Activities by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

* On January 3, there was a M4.8 earthquake at a depth of approximately 25 km in the central northern Rumoi region. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in an E-W direction. This event occurred within the crust.

* On January 24, there was a M5.2 earthquake at a depth of approximately 65 km, offshore southeast of Nemuro Peninsula. The focal mechanism had a tension axis in a direction of the subducting Pacific plate. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.

(2) Tohoku Region

* On January 8, there was a M5.4 earthquake at a depth of approximately 35 km, offshore Iwate prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred on the boundary between the Pacific and the continental plates.

* On January 10, there was a M5.0 earthquake at a depth of approximately 50 km, offshore Fukushima prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred on the boundary between the Pacific and the continental plates.

* On January 13, there was a M4.8 earthquake at a depth of approximately 50 km, offshore Iwate prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in an NNW-SSE direction. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

* On January 22, there was a M5.1 earthquake at a depth of approximately 15 km, offshore east of Chiba prefecture [offshore Ibaraki prefecture]. The focal mechanism showed a normal fault with a tension axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred within the crust of the continental plate.

* On January 28, there was a M4.8 earthquake at a depth of approximately 75 km under northern Ibaraki prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a normal fault with a tension axis in an ENE-WSW direction. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.

* On January 31, there was a M4.7 earthquake at a depth of approximately 10 km in northern Ibaraki prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a normal fault with a tension axis in an NE-SW direction. This event occurred within the crust.

* In the GNSS data for the Tokai region, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake.

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

There was no remarkable activity.

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

* On January 7, there was a M5.4 earthquake at a depth of approximately 70 km under the ocean near Yonagunijima. This event occurred within the subducting Philippine Sea plate.

* On January 28, there was a M4.9 earthquake at a depth of approximately 50 km under the ocean near Okinawa Main Island. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in an NW-SE direction. This event occurred on the boundary between the Philippine Sea and the continental plates.

Supplement

* On February 2, there was a 6.5 earthquake at a depth of approximately 110 km under the southern Tokachi region [central Tokachi region]. The focal mechanism had a tension axis in a direction of the subsiding Pacific plate. This event occurred within the Pacific plate.


Note: -[ ] was the regional name of the epicenter used in the Japan Meteorological Agency announcement.
     GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) is a general name of satellite positioning system such as GPS.



Supplementary Information to the Evaluation of Seismic Activities for January 2013

February 8, 2013
Earthquake Research Committee

1 Major Seismic Activities

The following are the numbers of earthquakes by magnitude that occurred in Japan and the surrounding area during January 2013.

(reference)

The following events for the period from January 2012 to late December 2012 have been listed as "Major Seismic Activities" in monthly "Evaluation of Seismic Activities"

 
– Offshore Fukushima Prefecture  M5.1 on January 23, 2012
(Depth of approximately 50 km)

 
– Eastern Yamanashi Prefecture-Fujigoko  M5.4 on January 28, 2012
(Depth of approximately 20 km)
 
– Near Sado  M5.7 on February 8, 2012
(Depth of approximately 15 km)

 
– Northern Ibaraki Prefecture  M5.2 on February 19, 2012
(Depth of approximately 5 km)
  – Offshore Ibaraki Prefecture M5.3 on March 1, 2012
(Depth of approximately 55 km)
  – Northern Ibaraki Prefecture  M5.4 on March 10, 2012
(Depth of approximately 5 km)
  – Offshore Sanriku  M6.9 on March 14, 2012
  – Offshore East of Chiba Prefecture  M6.1 on March 14, 2012
(Depth of approximately 15 km)
  – Offshore Iwate Prefecture  M6.6 on March 27, 2012
(Depth of approximately 20 km)
  – Offshore Fukushima Prefecture  M5.9 on April 1, 2012
(Depth of approximately 55 km)
  – Northeastern Chiba Prefecture  M5.8 on April 29, 2012
(Depth of approximately 50 km)
  – Offshore East of Aomori Prefecture  M6.1 on May 24, 2012
(Depth of approximately 60 km)
  – Northern Nagano Prefecture  M5.2 on July 10, 2012
(Depth of approximately 10 km)
  – Southern Tokachi Region  M6.1 on August 25, 2012
(Depth of approximately 50 km)
  – Offshore Miyagi Prefecture  M5.6 on August 30, 2012
(Depth of approximately 60 km)
  – Offshore Miyagi Prefecture  M5.6 on October 25, 2012
(Depth of approximately 50 km)
  – Offshore Sanriku  M7.3 on December 7, 2012

2 Nationwide Seismic Activities by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

There is no supplementary information for the Hokkaido region.

(2) Tohoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Tohoku region.

(3) Seismic activities and crustal deformations associated with the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

– In the aftershock area of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake, brisk seismicity has been seen. There is fear that large aftershocks will occur from now on, and there is a possibility that it will be hit by strong shaking and high tsunami. Crustal movements to the east which are thought to be the postseismic deformation have still been observed in a wide area from the Tohoku through the Kanto-Chubu regions, but they have gradually been decaying.

(4) Kanto-Chubu Region

"In the GNSS data for the Tokai region, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake":
(This evaluation is in agreement with the views presented at the regular meeting on January 21 of the Assessment Committee for Areas under Intensified Measures against Earthquake Disaster (reference below).)

(Reference)

Recent seismic and crustal activity in the Tokai region and its vicinity (Seismological and Volcanological Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, January 21)
"No changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake have been observed until now. (Excerpted)" 

(5) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku region.

(6) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

There is no supplementary information for the Kyushu-Okinawa region.

Reference 1
Earthquakes that are described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" (Monthly Report of Seismic Activity in Japan) have the following features.

  1. Events of M6.0 and greater, or events that have maximum seismic intensity 4 or greater
  2. Onshore events of M4.5 and greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater
  3. Events under the ocean areas of M5.0 or greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater

Reference 2
Information that is described in the "Supplementary Information to the Evaluation" includes:

  1. Reference information related to seismic activity described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  2. Recent earthquake activity over the past year related to the events described in "Major Seismic Activity" in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  3. Seismic activity that has been evaluated, but not included in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" because it is within normal bounds and not prominent