June 9, 2010
Earthquake Research Committee,
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion

Seismic Activity for May 2010

1 Major Seismic Activity

* There was no remarkable activity.

2 Nationwide Seismic Activity by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

* There was no remarkable activity.

(2) Tohoku Region

* There was no remarkable activity.

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

* On May 1, there was a M4.9 earthquake at a depth of approximately 10km in the Chuetsu region, Niigata prefecture. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred within the crust.

* On May 3, there was a M6.1 earthquake under the ocean area near Torishima. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction.

* There have been no anomalous changes observed in the GPS data for the Tokai region.

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

* There was no remarkable activity.

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

* On May 13, there was a M4.7 earthquake at a depth of approximately 90 km under the vicinity of the Kunisaki Peninsula [Iyonada]. The focal mechanism had a tension axis in a NNE-SSW direction. This event occurred within the Philippine Sea plate.

* On May 26, there was a M6.4 earthquake under the ocean area near Minami-Daitojima. The focal mechanism showed a normal fault with a tension axis in a NW-SE direction. This event occurred within the Philippine Sea plate.

Supplements

* On June 5, there was a M5.5 earthquake off-shore east of Hokkaido. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction.


[ ] was the regional name of the epicenter used in the Japan Meteorological Agency announcement.




Supplementary Information to the Evaluation of Seismic Activity for May 2010 by the Earthquake Research Committee

June 9, 2010

1 Major Seismic Activity

The following are the numbers of earthquakes by magnitude that occurred in Japan and the surrounding area during May 2010.

(reference)

The following events for the period from May 2009 to the end of April 2010 have been listed as "Major Seismic Activity" in monthly "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"


– Under Suruga Bay M6.5 on August 11, 2009 (depth of approximately 25km)

– Off-shore East of Hachijojima M6.6 on August 13, 2009

– Under the Ocean Area near Ishigakijima M6.7, M6.6 on August 17, 2009

– Off-shore East of the Izu Peninsula Seismic activity with
M5.0 on December 17,
M5.1 on December 18, 2009

 
– Under the Ocean Area near Ishigakijima M6.5 on February 7, 2010

 
– Under the Ocean Area near the Okinawa Main Island    M7.2 on February 27, 2010

 
– Along the Central Coast of Chile Mw8.8 on February 27, 2010
 
– Off-shore of Fukushima Prefecture M6.7 on March 14, 2010

2 Nationwide Seismic Activity by Region

(1) Hokkaido Region

There is no supplementary information for the Hokkaido region.

(2) Tohoku Region

There is no supplementary information for the Tohoku region.

(3) Kanto-Chubu Region

"On May 1, there was a M4.9 earthquake at a depth of approximately 10km in the Chuetsu region, Niigata prefecture. (excerpted)":
This event was located approximately 20km northeast of the aftershock area of the 2004 Niigata Chuetsu Earthquake.

"There have been no anomalous changes observed in the GPS data for the Tokai region.":
(This evaluation is in agreement with the views presented at the procedural meeting on June 1 of the Assessment Committee for Areas under Intensified Measures against Earthquake Disaster. (see reference below))

(reference) Recent seismic and crustal activity in the Tokai region and its vicinity (Seismological and Volcanological Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, June 1, 2010)

"So far, there have been no changes of activity which are likely to be associated with the Tokai earthquake.
1. Status of seismicity
General seismicity has been slightly strong since mid-2005 within the crust under mid-western Shizuoka prefecture.
There continue to be fewer events within the Philippine Sea plate under the region around Hamanako.
In other regions, seismic activity is generally at a normal level.
In addition, deep low-frequency earthquakes were observed near the plate boundary under Aichi to southern Nagano prefectures from April 20 through May 4. In this vicinity, a sequence of deep low-frequency earthquakes had not been observed since September 2008.

2. Status of crustal movements
There have been no remarkable changes observed over the entire region.
According to the GPS data and leveling results, the trend of long-term subsidence at Omaezaki has been continuing as before.
In addition, crustal movements were observed on the strainmeters in the neighboring regions from April 23 to 27, which are thought to have been caused by short-time slow slip around the plate boundary, and were concurrent with the deep low-frequency seismicity mentioned above. Crustal movements related to short-term slow slip had not been observed since March this year."

(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region

  –Non-stationary crustal movements are still observed near Bungo Strait, which have been seen since around autumn 2009. It is thought that they have been caused by slow slip at the boundary between the Philippine Sea and the continental plates.

(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region

  –Since May 16, there had been a slightly strong seismic activity with the largest M5.0, off-shore northwest of Amami Oshima, but its activity has been gradually subsiding.

Reference 1
Earthquakes that are described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" (Monthly Report of Seismic Activity in Japan) have the following features.

  1. Events of M6.0 and greater, or events that have maximum seismic intensity 4 or greater
  2. Onshore events of M4.5 and greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater
  3. Events under the ocean areas of M5.0 or greater that have maximum seismic intensity 3 or greater

Reference 2
Information that is described in the "Supplementary Information to the Evaluation" includes:

  1. Reference information related to seismic activity described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  2. Recent earthquake activity over the past year related to the events described in "Major Seismic Activity" in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity"
  3. Seismic activity that has been evaluated, but not included in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" because it is within normal bounds and not prominent