The following are the numbers of earthquakes by magnitude that
occurred in Japan and the surrounding area during April 2006.
(reference) Average numbers of earthquake occurrences over the
past thirty years (1971 - 2000)
The following regions have been noted as having significant
seismic activity during the period from April 2005 to the end of March
2006.
|
- Northeastern Chiba prefecture |
M6.1 on April 11, 2005 (depth approximately
50km) |
|
- Amakusa Ashikita
region, Kumamoto prefecture |
M4.8 on June 3, 2005
(depth approximately 10km) |
|
- Chuetsu region,
Niigata prefecture |
M5.0 on June 20, 2005
(depth approximately 15km) |
|
- Northwestern Chiba
prefecture |
M6.0 on July 23, 2005
(depth approximately 75km) |
|
- Off-shore of Miyagi
prefecture |
M7.2 on August 16,
2005
(depth approximately 40km) |
|
- Chuetsu region,
Niigata prefecture
|
M5.0 on August 21,
2005
(depth approximately 15km) |
|
- Off-shore of
Ibaraki prefecture
|
M6.3 on October 19,
2005
(depth approximately 50km) |
|
- Off-shore of Sanriku |
M7.2 on November 15, 2005 |
|
- Hyuganada
|
M5.5 on March 27,
2006
(depth approximately 35km) |
to the text
2 Nationwide Seismic Activity by Region
(1) Hokkaido Region
“On April 13, there was a M5.3 earthquake at a depth of approximately
45km off-shore of Urakawa. The focal mechanism showed a reverse fault
with a compression axis in a WNW-ESE direction. This event occurred at
the boundary between the Pacific and the continental plates.”
In addition to that event, there was a M4.6 earthquake on April 9, also
M4.5 and M4.6 earthquakes on April 26 off-shore of Urakawa.
to the text
(2) Tohoku Region
- On April 22, there was a M4.6 earthquake at a depth of approximately
65km off-shore of Miyagi prefecture (maximum seismic intensity 4). This
event occurred within the Pacific plate.
to the text
(3) Kanto-Chubu Region
"The long-term changes that have been observed since 2001 in
the continuous GPS data in the Tokai region, appear to have nearly
stopped recently." :
A According to the GPS data, the Pacific side of the Tokai-Chubu region
maintained a steady rate with movement to the WNW, consistent with the
subduction of the Philippine Sea plate toward the northwest. The
results, from observations in the area centered on western Shizuoka
prefecture, have been showing a trend of moderate change since about
April 2001. This long-term change seems to have nearly stopped
recently.
(This evaluation is in agreement with the views presented at the
procedural meeting on April 24 of the Assessment Committee for Areas
under Intensified Measures against Earthquake Disaster. (see reference
below))
(reference) "Recent seismic and crustal activity in the Tokai region
and its vicinity" (Japan Meteorological Agency, Department of
Seismology and Volcanology, April 24, 2006)
"So far, there have been no changes of activity which are
likely to be associated with the so-called Tokai earthquake.
There was no remarkable seismic activity in general. The
seismicity continues at a level lower than normal directly under Hamana
lake. In other regions, seismic activity is generally at a normal level.
The long-term crustal movements from the slow slip at the plate
boundary in the Tokai region and its neighboring area, seem to have
nearly stopped recently."
to the text
(4) Kinki-Chugoku-Shikoku Region
- There is no supplementary information for the Kinki - Chugoku -
Shikoku region.
to the text
(5) Kyushu-Okinawa Region
- There is no supplementary information for the Kyushu - Okinawa
region.
to the text
Reference 1
Earthquakes that are described in the "Evaluation of Seismic
Activity"(Monthly Report of Seismic Activity in Japan) are events of
M6.0 and greater, or events of M4.0 and greater (M5.0 or greater
off-shore) that have maximum intensity of 3 or greater.
Reference 2
Information that is described in the "Supplementary Information to the
Evaluation" includes:
1) |
Reference information
related
to seismic activity described in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" |
2) |
Recent earthquake activity
over the past year related to the events described in "Major Seismic
Activity" in the "Evaluation of Seismic Activity" |
3) |
Seismic activity that has
been evaluated, but not included in the "Evaluation of Seismic
Activity" because it is within normal bounds and not prominent. |
|